What is Probate?

Written by Wilson Stoyanoff, PLC

The most significant part of estate administration is the probate process. Probate is the process of administering your estate through the court system after you die. It is set up to pay the debts you owe and distribute the remaining assets to your beneficiaries. In Virginia, probate is handled in the circuit court of the county or city where you last lived.

During probate, a personal representative is appointed by the court. This will be an executor (if you die with a will) or administrator (if you don’t have a will). Notice of probate will then be filed, your property inventories, your debts paid and your remaining assets distributed.

Beneficiaries must be patient. Distributions from the probate estate cannot be compelled until six months after the appointment of the representative. An accounting must be filed by your personal representative no later than 16 months after appointment. Typically probate takes 9 months to two years to complete. If your will is contested, this process could take years to resolve.

In addition to probate filing fees, your personal representative is entitled to reasonable compensation for the administration of your estate, to be approved by the court. Under Virginia’s guidelines, the fees are calculated on a sliding scale, starting at 5% of the first $400,000. All of this is a matter of public record, available to anyone who is interested.

Not all of your assets are included in the probate process. Assets that pass by operation of law, rather than via your will are called non-probate assets. Non-probate assets include property owned as joint tenants with right of survivorship (typically real estate, but often including joint bank accounts or brokerage accounts). In Virginia, married couples can own property as tenants by the entireties. This form of ownership has the advantage of survivorship and in addition, the creditors of one spouse cannot reach this property. In either case, on death of one tenant (owner), the survivor owns these assets outright.

Other non-probate assets include life insurance, annuities and retirement accounts such as 401(k) and IRA plans, where you name a beneficiary in the contract. Other financial assets may be designated as “pay on death” or “transfer on death,” and will also pass outside of probate.

For more information about Probate/Estate Administration or Contact Us.

Adoption: Woman nurses baby before adoption

Filed under: Adoption Tags:

Joliet birth mother wants best for her newborn daughter

By DENISE M. BARAN-UNLAND For Sun-Times Media

It never occurred to Barb, 22 of Joliet, not to breast-feed her daughter, even though another family was adopting the baby.

After participating in the Will County Health Department’s WIC (Women, Infants and Children) program, Barb, who wishes to remain anonymous, attended the program’s breast-feeding classes and learned of the health benefits of breast-feeding for baby and mother.

So after Barb gave birth on April 30, she nursed her baby for three days then put her in the arms of the adoptive mother.

Barb continues to pump and dump her milk. She hopes she can find a nearby milk bank that will want her milk.

“There are plenty of babies who need breast milk, but their mothers either can’t or won’t nurse,” Barb said.

Decision questioned

Plenty of well-meaning people criticized her decision to briefly nurse a baby she would not raise.

“They thought breast-feeding would create an emotional bond that would make it harder to give her up,” Barb said. “But I’d been carrying her inside me for nine months. I felt her moving around inside me. That bond was already there.”

Barb and her boyfriend were only 21 when they learned she was pregnant. Both were working. Barb was also taking online classes to become a pharmacy technician. Neither one, Barb felt, was mature enough to provide high-quality parenting to an infant.

“A lot of pregnant 16-year-olds keep their babies, but they want to hang out with their friends all the time,” Barb said. “I think you give up that right when you become a mother.”

Adoption debate

Supporting a baby required making tough choices. Barb would have to quit her job; her boyfriend would have to work two jobs; or they both would work and leave the baby’s care to a succession of friends and relatives. None of the options settled with Barb.

Barb also feared the stress of raising a baby, along with reduced sleep and income, would lead to arguments over parenting styles and their loss of independence.

To prove her point, Barb set her alarm clock to every two hours around the clock and discovered she was not emotionally ready for that lifestyle.

“It would not have been right to keep her,” Barb said. “I love my daughter very much and so does my boyfriend, but we couldn’t be happier for her. Sometimes I get an emotional rush and start crying, but I know we made the right choice.”

Choosing right family

Barb knew adoption was not a dismal option. Her mother grew up with adopted parents.

Barb particularly wanted her daughter to experience a childhood similar to her own, so she requested the baby be adopted by a Catholic family. Equally satisfying for Barb is that the family has a 4-year-old girl; Barb and her sister were four years apart.

With an open adoption arrangement, Barb, as birth mother, is still an active member of the baby’s family. She’s just not the parent who rears the baby.

For pregnant women unable to responsibly raise a baby, Barb highly recommends open adoption. “Adoption is no longer good-bye forever,” she said.

For more information about Adoption or Contact Us.

Probate Attorney – What Does This Attorney Do?

Written by Andrew Stratton

There is a wide variety of legal specializations that lawyers may choose to focus on including divorce, bankruptcy, criminal proceedings and probate law. A probate attorney is one specialty that many people don’t thoroughly understand. It isn’t as dramatic or glamorous as some of the high profile specialties, but it is an important one, indeed.

Probate is a process of sorting out the financial estate of a person who has died. A probate attorney has the important task of making certain that all claims and divisions regarding the deceased person’s property are done fairly and according to the law. When a person has left a will, there may be questions about validity and proper distribution.

Many times a will includes the appointing of a representative, called an executor, who will help in carrying out the wishes of the deceased. The executor is often chosen because he or she is a trusted family member or business associate.

This law is a complicated component of the U.S. justice system. It is often fraught with emotional upheaval with family members and friends who may already be in an anxious state due to the loss of their loved one.

During this process, creditors will be notified. Legal notices in newspapers and the like are required to be published for certain lengths of time in order for all money owed to be paid out before the remaining assets are divided up between the heirs. At times, real estate property may be willed directly to individuals. In other cases, there may be the need to sell it prior to the division of assets, which can add to the lengthy process.

Taxes must also be taken into consideration and paid during the proceedings. In this extremely complicated legal process, it is important to have an expert overseeing all details in order to alleviate as much stress as possible. Every state has laws that are unique to the region, so it’s important to employ a representative who is well acquainted with the locale.

This situation can last for months or even as long as a year before all is settled and property is fairly divided. Court and lawyer costs that are required can add up to a substantial amount. Many people try to avoid excessive expenses by setting up a living trust. In this case, ownership of property can be transferred while a person is alive via the trust. When a person dies, his beneficiaries will inherit the property in this manner, which can be a more private affair than the public division of proceedings. Whether to use a probate attorney or a living trust option is an individual choice.

For more information about Probate or Contact Us.

Estate Planning: Living Trust Funding – Whose Job Is It?

Filed under: estate planning Tags:

Written by tsammons in Estate Planning, Living Trusts on IllinoisLawNews.Net

At home, I received a newsletter from a northwest suburban lawyer who prepares a lot of living trusts. This attorney does a lot of seminars and I must be in his direct mail target market now that I am old enough to be in the AARP army. I scanned the newsletter expecting the usual boilerplate, but one story left me amazed.

It was about how the attorney was experiencing a rash of probate estates that had to be opened for clients with living trusts. (Spoiler alert: You’re not supposed to have a probate with a living trust.)

The story pointed out that the clients simply were not “funding” their trusts correctly, which is the process of changing beneficiaries and the titles of accounts to the living trust. A trust has to be properly funded to avoid probate. If any asset valued at more than $100,000.00 is left in the client’s own name (not jointly or in the trust) a probate will be necessary. Avoiding probate is one of the reasons to use a living trust over a will, so the newsletter story pointed out that this was huge failure. Rather than blaming himself for this, the attorney laid responsibility for this problem squarely where it belonged —on all of his misguided, wayward clients.

After all, he gave the client a letter telling them exactly how to fund their living trust. Why couldn’t the client simply follow his instructions? This attorney is part of the “go in peace my son and fund the trust yourself” school of attorneys. Oddly, when attorneys refuse to participate in funding of trusts, the cost of the trust is usually pretty high. But many attorneys consider trust funding to be beneath them.

I believe that attorneys who draft living trusts have an obligation to help the client fund the trust. I have drafted thousands of living trusts for clients and my clients are intelligent people. They are also very busy and have a million demands and obligations. They do not have the time or the interest to learn how to fund their living trust. Nor should they have to.

I have tried every imaginable combination of methods for funding trusts and after 20 plus years, I’m convinced that, for me, there is only one way to handle trust funding that works. Both the attorney and client have to be involved:

1. It is too much to sign the trust and other documents AND fund the trust in one meeting, unless the trust funding is really simple. I usually sign the trust in one meeting and fund the trust in a second meeting.

2. At the trust signing I set up an appointment for two weeks down the line with the client for a trust funding meeting. If I don’t schedule an appointment at the trust signing, there is about a 60% chance the client will never get back to me and the trust will be left unfunded.

3. At the trust signing, I make a list of the forms that the client must obtain. The client calls for the forms and the forms are mailed or faxed to the client. Many institutions will not send the forms to me, so the client has to undertake this step. I have many of the common forms on file for Fidelity, Vanguard, Schwab and some of the more common companies.

4. From trial and error I have developed one unwavering rule: All beneficiaries must be changed on life insurance and IRA accounts. Many clients say “Oh don’t worry I know my spouse is primary and kids are secondary.” I always change the beneficiary designation for all IRAs and life insurance, even if the trust is not the beneficiary and no matter what the client says. I would estimate that about 75% of the current beneficiary designations are screwed up, missing or wrong.

5. Once all of the forms are obtained by the client, we have the trust funding meeting with the client in my office. I tell the client it will be the most boring 30 minutes of his or her life. I sort through the forms and fill them out for the client. The client signs them. I scan the forms into pdfs and we mail in the originals.

6. The trust funding meeting is essential. Sometimes the client will say “I’ll just drop off the forms and you can fill them in when you have time.” This does not work. First, the client will usually forget to drop off the forms. Second, I will never have the time to complete them. The trust funding meeting forces the client and me to finish the job.

For more information about Estate Planning or Contact Us.

Foreign Adoptions Tricky

Written by Doris O’Brien

How many times have parents in a fit of exasperation told disobedient children “I’d like to send you back!” The only catch is that there’s no place to send them, except up to their room or into a corner.

Apparently, that wasn’t a problem for Torry Hansen of Tennessee. Eight months into an exhausting struggle with her adopted 7-year-old Russian son, whom she named Jared, Ms. Hansen had had quite enough. For $200 she arranged with airline personnel to see that the recalcitrant kid was flown back to Moscow and met there by someone of authority. (TV footage of Jared in Russia showed him about as fazed by all of this as Macaulay Culkin in “Home Alone!”)

A friend of mine, concerned that her young teen-aged grandson was planning to travel to Chicago alone, asked me what I thought of the little boy sent back unaccompanied to his native Russia. I said there must have been another way to handle the situation. She agreed.

But not everyone does. Another local teacher/grandmother believes there are times when a strange child gets so obstreperous as to be a danger, and that those who handled the adoption surely noticed such tendencies without alerting Ms. Hansen.

No child is guaranteed, whether adopted or birthed. And every parent-child relationship is unique. What distinguishes this one from others, however, is that it caused an avalanche of Soviet anger against America. The incident may now be old news, but it still festers, and will likely bring about changes in the Russian government’s policy for future international adoptions — if any are even permitted.

The trouble is, however, that Russia has an estimated 740,000 orphans, and the natives aren’t taking in enough of them. Americans adopted over 1,500 Russian children in 2009, the largest number after China and Ethiopia. Presumably, most of these adoptions turned out well. But whenever a problem develops, others seem to come to light, like the never-ending procession of Tiger Woods’ romantic partners.

It’s been revealed, for example, that 14 Russian kids adopted by American families have died of abuse since 1996. The fact that many American children suffered the same fate, and that even a larger percentage of orphans were abused by Russian families does not mitigate the tragedy. To some degree, we expect a higher standard of behavior from those who consciously make the effort to bring a child from elsewhere into their lives.

Finding suitable homes for orphaned kids is hard enough. But an added complication is that many Russian orphans suffer from fetal alcohol syndrome. In a past column I wrote about the excessive consumption of vodka in Russia, a dangerous habit that is spreading among our own young people. Babies born with this disease unwittingly suffer the sins of their parents, making them harder to place in adoptive homes. Often the child’s symptoms may not even be revealed for fear of rejection.

That’s basically the argument of Torry Hansen, who blames the WACAP adoption agency for not leveling with her. The agency, in turn, insists that its clients are fully informed about those they adopt, and that Ms. Hansen could have sought help from a stateside representative, rather than take the drastic measure she did. Admittedly, there is little follow-up on adoptions once a child ships out of Russia.

Adoption has always been regarded as a noble act. At its best it brings love, a sense of belonging, and greater opportunity to unclaimed children. Incidents such as the return of Jared — and the attempt of unauthorized church members to spirit children out of earthquake-ravaged Haiti — have unfairly given a bad name to adoption by Americans.

As a result of Torry Hansen’s actions, Russian agencies are keeping some 3,000 American families in limbo about the status of adoptions already in progress. Perhaps if the laws of our own land involved less red tape for adopting U.S. children, there might be fewer reasons for our citizens to face the Red Menace abroad.

For more information about Adoption or Contact Us.

Adoption: Ohio House Bill 411

Filed under: Adoption Tags: ,

Ohio House Bill 411 would amend Ohio adoption law to allow an adult to be adopted if the adult is the child of the spouse of the adoption petitioner and the adult consents to the adoption.

Currently, Ohio adoption law says that an adult can be adopted if the adult is disabled, mentally retarded, had a foster child care giver or child step-parent relationship with the adopters as a minor, of if he or she were in the permanent custody of a children services agency at the time he or she turned 18 and consents to the adoption.

In some situations after a couple marries they may want to combine their families. Under current Ohio adoption law, the other spouse’s adult child cannot be adopted if they were 18 at the time of the marriage. If, for example, a husband and wife get married and one spouse wants to adopt the children of the other and the other spouse might have some children that are minors and some that are adults, only the minor children could be adopted and not the adult children. Or, if a spouse remarries and changes her name, she may wish to have her minor children adopted and their names and birth certificates would be changed. However, if there was an adult child in this scenario, the adult child would be excluded and left out.

This pending legislation would cure this defect in Ohio’s adoption laws.

For more information about Adoption or Contact Us.

Navigating the Foreign Adoption Process

Daytime Columbus Interview regarding navigating the foreign adoption process

More Teens Choosing to Forgo Adoption

Filed under: Adoption Tags:

Posted: Jan 08, 2009 on NewsChannel10.com

Texas boasts one of the highest teen pregnancy rates in the nation, and more of those teen moms are opting to keep their baby.

Nationwide, including the Texas Panhandle, adoption rates are at their lowest ever, with fewer than two percent of pregnant girls choosing to go that route. Catholic Family Services says they think part of the reason teens are choosing to keep their child is because there is not the teen pregnancy stigma there once was. Perhaps another reason… Teen pregnancy is often glamorized in the media, with more and more young, unwed movie stars having children.

Adoption Supervisor Holly Campidilli says, “these babies still cry, they still get sick, they still need formula, they still need diapers, and a lot of teens and single parents aren’t in the situations that these stars are in with a lot of resources, so definitely I think they’re seeing the positive.” The latest teen birth rate numbers we have are from 2006, but in that year, there were 63 births for every 1000 women, between the ages of 15 and 19.

For more information about Adoption or Contact Us.

Thomas Taneff | 600 South High Street, Suite 201 | Columbus, Ohio 43215 | Phone: (614) 241-2181 | Fax: (614) 241-2160